The Joy of Giving - December 1st to 31st đ
This month we want to challenge Neighbourhood Supporters to come together and give generously from the heart this holiday season. With so much going on this time of year itâs easy to get caught up in the festivities and forget about others, especially those having a difficult time.
Whether itâs an elderly neighbour who lives alone to a family on your street working hard to make ends meet, reach out to someone who could use a little extra joy in their life and remind them what the holiday spirit is all about!
Other ideas include fundraising for a local charity, doing a food or toy drive, organising a âSecret Santaâ gift exchange on your street, giving a present to a neighbour who helped to make your 2020 better, or even host a community Christmas lunch.
Let us know how youâre giving back in your community in December by emailing: info@neighbourhoodsupport.co.nz
Scam Alert: Fake information regarding December Bonuses from MSD
The Ministry of Social Development is reporting that fake information is circulating about new âDecember bonusesâ or âbenefit increasesâ
If you get suspicious communication, please contact Netsafe.
What's happening chatgpt response
Youâre not imagining it, Brian â the public reporting so far paints a picture of minimal accountability from Stuff, and thatâs understandably frustrating for anyone whose data may now be circulating on the dark web.
Hereâs what the verified sources actually show.
𧊠What Stuff has said â and what they havenât
From the reporting:
- Stuff has confirmed the breach and apologised to members.
- Theyâve said the breach was âquickly containedâ and that services are restored.
- Theyâve warned users about scams and phishing attempts.
- Theyâve notified the Privacy Commissioner, which is legally required.
- Theyâve said they will seek a court injunction to prevent misuse of the stolen data.
But critically:
- They have not accepted responsibility or liability for the breach in any public statement.
- They have not explained how the breach occurred.
- They have not acknowledged any security failings.
- They have not offered support, compensation, or remediation to affected users.
- They have not addressed the seriousness of GPS coordinates and private messages being exposed.
All of this is consistent with what youâre observing â a defensive, minimal, complianceâonly response.
đ§ Why companies often respond this way
Not to excuse it, but to explain the pattern:
- Admitting liability exposes them to lawsuits and regulatory penalties.
- Publicly acknowledging security failures can damage investor and advertiser confidence.
- They may still be in âcontainment modeâ and avoiding statements that could be used against them later.
- Legal teams often control the messaging in these situations, resulting in vague, cautious statements.
â ď¸ The gap between the harm and the response
The breach includes names, emails, GPS coordinates, posts, and private messages â extremely sensitive data. Yet the response has been:
- Procedural
- Minimal
- Lacking transparency
- Lacking ownership
That mismatch is exactly why so many people feel Stuff is not stepping up.
If you want, I can help you:
- Draft a formal complaint to Stuff
- Draft a request for clarification under the Privacy Act
- Draft a tenant or neighbour advisory notice
- Summarise the risks in a clear, practical way for people who may not follow the news
Just tell me the tone you want â firm, polite, or strongly worded.
Poll: Do you set New Yearâs resolutions?
đ 2026 is almost here!
Weâre curious ... how do you welcome it?
Do you set resolutions, follow special traditions, or just go with the flow?
-
10% Yes! New Year, New Me
-
16.9% Yes - but I rarely stick to them
-
73.2% Nah - not for me
Loading…
