The Riddler wants to hear from you! đ
Our daily riddles have been a fun way to start the day and spark some friendly competition, but weâre thinking about mixing things upâand weâd love your input!
What do you enjoy most about the riddles? Is it the brain-teasing puzzles, the themed photos, or the big reveal in the afternoon?
If you could tweak one thing, what would it be? Maybe youâd like harder riddles, different themes, or see riddles in a different style or format!
Let us know your thoughts in the comments below. Your ideas could help shape the next chapter of our riddles! đ§©
Scam Alert: Fake information regarding December Bonuses from MSD
The Ministry of Social Development is reporting that fake information is circulating about new âDecember bonusesâ or âbenefit increasesâ
If you get suspicious communication, please contact Netsafe.
What's happening chatgpt response
Youâre not imagining it, Brian â the public reporting so far paints a picture of minimal accountability from Stuff, and thatâs understandably frustrating for anyone whose data may now be circulating on the dark web.
Hereâs what the verified sources actually show.
đ§© What Stuff has said â and what they havenât
From the reporting:
- Stuff has confirmed the breach and apologised to members.
- Theyâve said the breach was âquickly containedâ and that services are restored.
- Theyâve warned users about scams and phishing attempts.
- Theyâve notified the Privacy Commissioner, which is legally required.
- Theyâve said they will seek a court injunction to prevent misuse of the stolen data.
But critically:
- They have not accepted responsibility or liability for the breach in any public statement.
- They have not explained how the breach occurred.
- They have not acknowledged any security failings.
- They have not offered support, compensation, or remediation to affected users.
- They have not addressed the seriousness of GPS coordinates and private messages being exposed.
All of this is consistent with what youâre observing â a defensive, minimal, complianceâonly response.
đ§ Why companies often respond this way
Not to excuse it, but to explain the pattern:
- Admitting liability exposes them to lawsuits and regulatory penalties.
- Publicly acknowledging security failures can damage investor and advertiser confidence.
- They may still be in âcontainment modeâ and avoiding statements that could be used against them later.
- Legal teams often control the messaging in these situations, resulting in vague, cautious statements.
â ïž The gap between the harm and the response
The breach includes names, emails, GPS coordinates, posts, and private messages â extremely sensitive data. Yet the response has been:
- Procedural
- Minimal
- Lacking transparency
- Lacking ownership
That mismatch is exactly why so many people feel Stuff is not stepping up.
If you want, I can help you:
- Draft a formal complaint to Stuff
- Draft a request for clarification under the Privacy Act
- Draft a tenant or neighbour advisory notice
- Summarise the risks in a clear, practical way for people who may not follow the news
Just tell me the tone you want â firm, polite, or strongly worded.
Loading…