Nearby
Mount Roskill, Three Kings, Penrose, One Tree Hill, Onehunga, Mangere Bridge, Mangere, Hillsborough, Mount Eden, Epsom
Royal Oak news is brought to you by the team at Central Leader
Recent posts
Thank you for using Neighbourly
Red Cross Shop Onehunga - there’s still time to grab our Winter clothing as we countdown to Spring ☀️❄️
📍200 Onehunga Mall Road
📞096221565
Mon-Sat: 9.00am to 5.00pm
Sun: 10.00am to 5.00pm
A few weeks ago, the Neighbourly team shared a round of complaints over our morning cuppa about the challenges of juggling runny noses and work commitments.
After reading Flip Grater's opinion piece, Playing germ roulette with our kids’ health, we felt a collective sense of relief - … View moreA few weeks ago, the Neighbourly team shared a round of complaints over our morning cuppa about the challenges of juggling runny noses and work commitments.
After reading Flip Grater's opinion piece, Playing germ roulette with our kids’ health, we felt a collective sense of relief - another parent shares our niggling worries.
We wanted to check in with our online neighbours: do you feel the same way? We are all busy, and keeping children home from school is sometimes impossible given other responsibilities. Busy lives and the apparent loss of collective energy around monitoring cold symptoms have led to more students and staff in shared spaces with sniffles and coughs.
But what do you think? Is this a concern?
We want to know: Are there clear Guidelines on when to keep kids off of school?
Should we be having a nuanced conversation about risk management, and how to better support working families?
Share your opinion with us below!
Which companies offer hardship discounts?
===================================
Only a few power companies provide discounts for customers facing hardship, according to a survey conducted for this series by Common Grace.
Mercury said it excluded 135 households from the April 1 price increase and… View moreWhich companies offer hardship discounts?
===================================
Only a few power companies provide discounts for customers facing hardship, according to a survey conducted for this series by Common Grace.
Mercury said it excluded 135 households from the April 1 price increase and froze their prices. It supported about 2000 customers a month experiencing financial hardship. Globug, owned by Mercury, gave the same answer.
Contact has its “HandUp programme”, which it says gave individual payment options and discounted energy to customers in need. It said it also offered short-term energy credits for customers needing immediate relief, and full debt forgiveness to clear long-term, unmanageable debt.
“In 2024, this programme assisted 3500 households, and in the last year, almost $500k of support has been offered.”
Genesis, and now-defunct Frank, pointed to the Power Shout scheme, wherein 328,830 hours of free power were supplied to 4205 vulnerable customers.
Toast, a not-for-profit social retailer, has up to 300 customers who have been referred by its community partners specifically for discounted power.
“Toast provides them with all-year lower pricing than their previous retailer and also aims to discount their tariffs by 30% over winter months. They estimate these discounts will amount to $70,000 off standard Toast tariffs during winter 2025,” the company said.
The remaining companies that responded to the survey said they did not provide discounted power.
Meridian said, “In our experience, discounts are not the way to help people transition out of energy hardship.”
Meridian has its Energy Wellbeing Programme. It provides customers with budgeting support, in-home assessments and tailored support to make their homes healthier, easier and cheaper to heat.
“In some cases, this involves providing items like curtains, insulation, or heat pumps. With more than 2500 households already assisted, we have found this to be a far more sustainable solution.”
Pulse did not offer discounts for hardship: “Our priority is to keep electricity pricing as low as we can for all customers. This year, as an example, from 1 April we only flowed through changes in network services charges and did not change our energy rates.”
Nova said it did not offer discounts for hardship, preferring to work through its support teams.
Ecotricity did not offer discounted power, but was “committed to supporting customers in hardship by offering flexible payment options, working closely with them to manage arrears and connecting them with external support services where appropriate”.
Electric Kiwi pointed to its daily free hour of power. Pre-pay service Wise said it did not offer discounted power to people in hardship because that was difficult to define.
Switch Utilities said it did not offer hardship discounts because the issue was “wider than those in immediate hardship”.
==================================================
Kiwi pukupuku (the little spotted kiwi) have been rediscovered in the wild on mainland Aotearoa New Zealand for the first time in five decades!
The pukupuku is the smallest and one of the most vulnerable kiwi species. Only around 2000 birds remain on offshore islands and predator-free … View moreKiwi pukupuku (the little spotted kiwi) have been rediscovered in the wild on mainland Aotearoa New Zealand for the first time in five decades!
The pukupuku is the smallest and one of the most vulnerable kiwi species. Only around 2000 birds remain on offshore islands and predator-free sanctuaries, and are the descendants of just 5 birds which had been translocated to Kapiti Island from South Westland in 1912.
The March discovery in the remote Adams Wilderness Area, on the West Coast, is definitely choice news.
Ka pai to the amazing investigation team: DOC biodiversity ranger Iain Graham and his conservation dog, Brew!
We hope this news brings a smile!
Two identical round mirrors, straight out of the box, never used, as good as the day they were bought. The diameter or length across from one side to the other is 80cm.
$50 each, or both for $80.
Four lovely lamp shades, in good condition but they do need a good clean. One has a crack on the bottom, as shown in the picture.
Give me whatever you think they’re worth.
If anyone needs an old, but still working well, radio cassette deck, this unit is from 1986, bought in Australia, and little used in recent times. The radio and tape deck both still work fine, the speakers are detachable, and there is even a jack so you can input music from another device.
Give … View moreIf anyone needs an old, but still working well, radio cassette deck, this unit is from 1986, bought in Australia, and little used in recent times. The radio and tape deck both still work fine, the speakers are detachable, and there is even a jack so you can input music from another device.
Give me what you think it is worth.
Has been sitting in the garage for a while, but still functions perfectly well, and does a good job sucking up leaves. The front is on a wheel to help support the weight, which makes it lighter and easy to use.
Needs a good clean, but will come up well. On rollers. Must collect and take away. Free!!
Has been in a wet garage and is not in very good condition at all, so either a do-up job or maybe good for spare parts. If no one wants it, I’ll break it into pieces and dump it, but hopefully someone can take better care of it than I, and restore it to its playing days.
Free, but you must … View moreHas been in a wet garage and is not in very good condition at all, so either a do-up job or maybe good for spare parts. If no one wants it, I’ll break it into pieces and dump it, but hopefully someone can take better care of it than I, and restore it to its playing days.
Free, but you must collect it and take it away.
Million-dollar homes now the norm across the ditch - even in “affordable” Adelaide and Brisbane.
- Kiwis moving to Australia for higher wages face expensive housing, especially in major cities like Brisbane and Sydney.
- Queensland is a popular destination, but affordable housing is scarce, … View moreMillion-dollar homes now the norm across the ditch - even in “affordable” Adelaide and Brisbane.
- Kiwis moving to Australia for higher wages face expensive housing, especially in major cities like Brisbane and Sydney.
- Queensland is a popular destination, but affordable housing is scarce, with prices rising significantly.
- Despite higher wages, the cost of living, particularly housing, challenges Kiwis seeking a new life in Australia.
Kiwis heading across the ditch for higher wages and better jobs won’t find cheaper houses, Australian real estate agents have warned.
There were 70,000 migrant departures in the year to the end of March, with the latest Stats NZ figures highlighting that nearly 60% departing Kiwi citizens went to Australia.
Analysis of last year’s migration figures by Australian and New Zealand real estate agency Ray White found that Queensland was the favoured location for expats, closely followed by Victoria. Less than a fifth of migrants headed to NSW, down from a peak of 27%, while the number moving to Perth has grown by 14%.
And while jobs are easier to come by and offer better pay in Australia, property experts told that affordable housing in the state capitals was hard to find.
A news report in The Guardian Australia recently asked if Australia’s “bloated property market” was “destroying the middle class”, and highlighted the real estate plight of professionals with good jobs and a good education. Property prices in Australia, it said, were increasing at a faster pace than families can save for a deposit.
According to the latest figures from property analysis firm Cotality, one in three Australian homes has a value of A$1 million or more, with the nationwide median now A$838,00, up 41% in five years.
Brisbane, perceived by some Kiwis as more affordable than Auckland, is now Australia’s second-most expensive capital city after Sydney. Its median house value has jumped 76% since 2020 to just over A$1m.
Adelaide, another city that has attracted buyers on the hunt for cheaper homes, has seen house prices soar post-Covid. The South Australian capital’s median property value is hurtling towards the A$1m mark, with the average Adelaide house now costing nine times the median household income (New Zealand homes, by comparison, cost 7.3 times the median household income, the lowest level since 2019).
Cotality Australia head of research Eliza Owen told that housing in Australia was generally expensive, for both buyers and renters. Australia’s median rent had risen by 40.3% in the last five years to A$665 per week, whereas the growth rate has been much slower in New Zealand at 29%.
Rising house prices in Australia and flat or falling prices in New Zealand made it harder for Kiwis looking to start a new life across the ditch.
Ray White’s examination of what homeowners in New Zealand’s five biggest cities – Auckland, Christchurch, Wellington, Hamilton and Tauranga – could buy in Australia illustrates the challenges Kiwis face.
Senior data analyst Atom Go Tian looked at what the median sale price in each of the major Kiwi metros could get across the ditch. Unsurprisingly, Auckland money provides buyers with the most choice, with Go Tian identifying 54 districts in Australia’s state capitals and lower-tier towns and cities with a lower median value than Auckland’s.
However, homes in just three Sydney districts are cheaper than the cost of a typical Auckland home, and they are on the far-flung fringes. House prices in Sydney’s popular Eastern Suburbs and North Shore are more than double those in Auckland. Also out of reach would be houses on the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast.
Go Tian found that Tauranga and Wellington house prices were cheaper than 37 and 36 Australian districts respectively, including the outer suburbs of Perth, Brisbane and Melbourne, while Hamilton and Christchurch money wouldn’t be enough to get into Australia’s big cities.
Go Tian said the data suggested Kiwis might have to bypass Australia’s state capitals in favour of the more affordable regional centres like Bendigo, Ballarat, Cairns and Townsville.
Ray White AKG business owner Avi Khan, whose patch covers Queensland’s biggest markets, told that Kiwis expecting to land a property bargain on the Gold Coast or in Brisbane would be disappointed. “There’s a common misconception that it’s cheaper to buy houses in Australia,” he said.
“It’s harder to get into the Gold Coast market. The jobs are based around Brisbane, so most people end up buying in Brisbane.”
He said that a four-bedroom, two-bathroom house on 500sqm and about 35-40 minutes from Brisbane CBD could be picked up for between A$800,00 and A$900,000. The same property would have been about A$200,000 cheaper two years ago, he said.
“I think a lot of Kiwis heading over here are surprised at how expensive it is, relative to 24 months ago.”
However, they were still arriving, moving to Brisbane for job prospects. Some bought homes near friends and family, as well as close to the beach as they could afford.
Khan said a housing shortage in Australia and Brisbane, in particular, was a challenge for those looking to buy or rent. “It takes a little bit longer to buy a house here because there’s so much competition.”
Harcourts WA chief executive Shane Kempton said competition for homes in his patch was similarly “fierce”, adding that stock levels in Perth had dropped to 4000 – about a third of where they usually sit.
Houses were often selling above asking price, he said, adding that vendors would typically receive multiple offers.
However, the job opportunities in Western Australia’s mining, energy and resource sectors were strong pull factors for Kiwis. “WA is short of skilled tradespeople, so work in these fields is plentiful. Perth lifestyle is relaxed with plenty of outdoor options with beaches, bush, islands and forests to explore.”
Kempton said he often met Kiwis at sporting events – especially rugby and netball games - and said they seemed to favour certain Perth suburbs, including East Rockingham, Midland, and Butler.
For Kiwis looking for more affordable areas to live in, Kempton suggested Two Rocks and Mandurah, about an hour outside of Perth. Prices in both were just under A$600,000.
Michael Pallier, managing director of Sydney Sotheby’s International Realty, said most of the Kiwis who were shifting to Australia’s largest city were renting, not buying.
“Sydney is one of the most expensive cities in the world. The wages are also much higher here. So, they can get a good job when they come here, and they can still find places to live – there’s accommodation available.”
Pallier had employed a hardworking Kiwi to work in his office at the start of the year and had come across many others who had also made the move.
However, Pallier said they quickly discovered that accommodation was much more expensive than they had expected, and they had to move almost an hour away from the city to be able to buy anything for A$1m or less.
“You are going to pay A$1m-plus for a house, even in Sydney’s Western suburbs. It doesn’t really get you a lot. Rent is A$600 plus a week for a two-bedroom apartment, A$1000-plus if it’s in the CBD.”
Kevin Chokshi, director of Ray White The Bayside Group, said Melbourne’s property market had only started to pick up in the last few months after a relatively flat two years.
His advice to Kiwis and Australians looking to buy in Melbourne was simple: act now. But he warned that competition was building, with auctions the favoured sales method.
Entry-level prices for standalone houses in the city were around A$900,000, while units sat between A$600,000 and A$700,000.
Prices dropped the further out buyers went, and those willing to travel about 40 minutes to an hour into the CBD might be able to snag a home in Frankston, Pakenham, Sunbury, Werribee or Epping for around A$700,000.
One Kiwi who has no complaints about her shift from Auckland to Brisbane is Clarissa Searle. She told OneRoof the move across the ditch was one of the best things she had done.
Friends had been encouraging her for years to make the move, and in September 2023, she finally listened.
Most of her mates had settled in Sydney, but Searle decided to make Brisbane her new home. “I just felt like I needed a change and more opportunities career-wise,” she told.
The 33-year-old, who works for a property development company, was lucky enough to secure a one-bedroom apartment for A$600 a week overlooking the Brisbane River before she arrived.
It was much better than the two-bedroom unit she rented in Auckland’s Mount Eden. “I get a lot more for my money here,” she said. “It’s like I’m living in a resort hotel. It’s gorgeous.”
She has noticed substantial increases in both rents and house prices since arriving in the city – her own rent lifted to A$635 a week and is set to rise again to A$700.
“Prices have gone up like crazy in the last year. There are just so many people looking for places to live at the moment. You turn up to rental inspections and there are like 50 or 60 people viewing it.”
Searle recently met with a mortgage broker to talk about buying her first home in the city. While Brisbane property prices were cheaper than prices in Auckland when she first arrived, this was changing, and she wanted to jump on the property ladder before prices were out of her reach.
But higher wages and cheaper grocery bills – especially healthy food – meant she still had more money left in her pocket than she had when she was in Auckland.
Not everything is cheaper – cars aren’t – but the overall cost of living probably was, she said. There are also extra incentives for Queenslanders, such as rebates on power and appliance bills and cheap public transport.
“I will not move back to NZ anytime soon. It’s such a better lifestyle here,” she said.
===================================================
We’re constantly being reminded by news articles and social media posts that we should be getting more sleep. You probably don’t need to hear it again – not sleeping enough is bad for your brain, heart and overall health, not to mention your skin and sex drive.
But what about sleeping “too… View moreWe’re constantly being reminded by news articles and social media posts that we should be getting more sleep. You probably don’t need to hear it again – not sleeping enough is bad for your brain, heart and overall health, not to mention your skin and sex drive.
But what about sleeping “too much”? Recent reports that sleeping more than nine hours could be worse for your health than sleeping too little may have you throwing up your hands in despair.
It can be hard not to feel confused and worried. But how much sleep do we need? And what can sleeping a lot really tell us about our health? Let’s unpack the evidence.
Sleep is essential for our health
==========================
Along with nutrition and physical activity, sleep is an essential pillar of health.
During sleep, physiological processes occur that allow our bodies to function effectively when we are awake. These include processes involved in muscle recovery, memory consolidation and emotional regulation.
The Sleep Health Foundation – Australia’s leading not-for-profit organisation that provides evidence-based information on sleep health – recommends adults get seven to nine hours of sleep per night.
Some people are naturally short sleepers and can function well with less than seven hours.
However, for most of us, sleeping less than seven hours will have negative effects. These may be short term; for example, the day after a poor night’s sleep you might have less energy, worse mood, feel more stressed and find it harder to concentrate at work.
In the long term, not getting enough good quality sleep is a major risk factor for health problems. It’s linked to a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease – such as heart attacks and stroke – metabolic disorders, including type 2 diabetes, poor mental health, such as depression and anxiety, cancer and death.
So, it’s clear that not getting enough sleep is bad for us. But what about too much sleep?
Could too much sleep be bad?
========================
In a recent study, researchers reviewed the results of 79 other studies that followed people for at least one year and measured how sleep duration impacts the risk of poor health or dying to see if there was an overall trend.
They found people who slept for short durations – less than seven hours a night – had a 14% higher risk of dying in the study period, compared to those who slept between seven and eight hours. This is not surprising given the established health risks of poor sleep.
However, the researchers also found those who slept a lot – which they defined as more than nine hours a night – had a greater risk of dying: 34% higher than people who slept seven to eight hours.
This supports similar research from 2018, which combined results from 74 previous studies that followed the sleep and health of participants across time, ranging from one to 30 years. It found sleeping more than nine hours was associated with a 14% increased risk of dying in the study period.
Research has also shown sleeping too long (meaning more than required for your age) is linked to health problems such as depression, chronic pain, weight gain and metabolic disorders.
This may sound alarming. But it’s crucial to remember these studies have only found a link between sleeping too long and poor health – this doesn’t mean sleeping too long is the cause of health problems or death.
So, what’s the link?
===============
Multiple factors may influence the relationship between sleeping a lot and having poor health.
It’s common for people with chronic health problems to consistently sleep for long periods. Their bodies may need additional rest to support recovery, or they may spend more time in bed due to symptoms or medication side effects.
People with chronic health problems may also not be getting high quality sleep, and may stay in bed for longer to try and get some extra sleep.
Additionally, we know risk factors for poor health, such as smoking and being overweight, are also associated with poor sleep.
This means people may be sleeping more because of existing health problems or lifestyle behaviours, not that sleeping more is causing the poor health.
Put simply, sleeping may be a symptom of poor health, not the cause.
What’s the ideal amount?
====================
The reasons some people sleep a little and others sleep a lot depend on individual differences – and we don’t yet fully understand these.
Our sleep needs can be related to age. Teenagers often want to sleep more and may physically need to, with sleep recommendations for teens being slightly higher than adults at eight to ten hours. Teens may also go to bed and wake up later.
Older adults may want to spend more time in bed. However, unless they have a sleep disorder, the amount they need to sleep will be the same as when they were younger.
But most adults will require seven to nine hours, so this is the healthy window to aim for.
It’s not just about how much sleep you get. Good quality sleep and a consistent bed time and wake time are just as important – if not more so – for your overall health.
The bottom line
=============
Given many Australian adults are not receiving the recommended amount of sleep, we should focus on how to make sure we get enough sleep, rather than worrying we are getting too much.
To give yourself the best chance of a good night’s sleep, get sunlight and stay active during the day, and try to keep a regular sleep and wake time. In the hour before bed, avoid screens, do something relaxing, and make sure your sleep space is quiet, dark, and comfortable.
If you notice you are regularly sleeping much longer than usual, it could be your body’s way of telling you something else is going on. If you’re struggling with sleep or are concerned, speak with your GP. You can also explore the resources on the Sleep Health Foundation website.
===================================================
Consumer NZ says supermarkets are still making pricing errors, despite increasing pressure and scrutiny on them.
Charges have been filed and a number of supermarkets have pleaded guilty to breaching the Fair Trading Act due to inaccurate pricing and misleading specials.
But Consumer NZ says … View moreConsumer NZ says supermarkets are still making pricing errors, despite increasing pressure and scrutiny on them.
Charges have been filed and a number of supermarkets have pleaded guilty to breaching the Fair Trading Act due to inaccurate pricing and misleading specials.
But Consumer NZ says misleading specials are still costing shoppers tens of millions of dollars a year and has launched a petition calling for tougher penalties for breaches of the ac
It provided examples of a number of ways that people could be caught out by misleading signage in supermarkets.
Dodgy multibuy
=============
A dodgy multibuy refers to a situation where the individual price and the multibuy price don't add up to a saving.
supermarket price errorsA mince special where a tray of meat was $4 or people could buy three for $20.
Consumer NZ pointed to this mince special where a tray of meat was $4 or people could buy three for $20.
In another case, packaging seemed to be making a confusing difference.
The Gingernuts that were selling for $5 but the club price for a twin-pack was $5.59.
Two individual backs of Gingernuts were selling for $5 but the club price for a 500g twin-pack was $5.59.
Different pricing
=============
Sometimes the price on the shelf tag does not match what you pay at checkout.
A box of Coca Cola a customer paid more at checkout for than the shelf price tag.
In this case, supplied by Consumer, the price tag on the shelf said $27, but the customer paid more than $35 at the checkout.
Confusing
========
Double cream brie with two prices. Consumer provided an example of double cream brie was "reduced" to $10.60 for a quick sale - or was it on sale for $9.80?
Mismatches
==========
Sometimes it seems as though there are multiple labels for the same item.
In this case, two signs had two different prices for a single avocado.
Another sign at the same supermarket saying a single avocado is $1.69.
"One said $1.69. The other said $1.99," Consumer NZ spokesperson Abby Damen said.
"The customer was charged $1.99. She returned two days later to ask what could be done about the pricing error. She was offered a refund of the price difference but after pointing out the supermarket's new refund policy, she was refunded $2 and also kept her avocado."
Chief executive at Consumer Jon Duffy said anyone who was charged more than the shelf price was entitled by law to a refund of the difference.
He said both supermarket chains promised a full refund in that scenario, but consumers sometimes had to know that was what was available.
A Foodstuffs spokesperson said with more than 14,000 products in a typical supermarket, and prices changing frequently due to supplier costs, promotions or new product liens, pricing was a complex job.
"But for our customers, it's simple. They rightly expect the price on the shelf to match what they pay at the checkout," he said.
"We take pricing accuracy as seriously as health and safety, aiming for zero errors.
"Across our local, family-owned stores, we manage tens of thousands of price labels and process millions of transactions every week, and we've invested in better systems, daily checks and electronic shelf labels to help get it right.
"If we do get it wrong, our policy is that the customer gets a refund and keeps the product. We've also strengthened staff training and store processes to make sure pricing is clear and accurate."
Woolworths said it had more 3.5 million transactions in our stores each week "and sometimes errors do occur".
"When they do, we try to make things right, through our long-standing and market-leading refund policy. Under that policy, if a customer is charged more than the advertised price for a product, they get a full refund and can keep the product."
Duffy said Consumer had received 20 complaints about supermarket pricing since Tuesday. A normal rate would be two a day, he said.
====================================================
The Government is making a “significant, but necessary change” to New Zealand’s electoral laws to address “strain on the system”.
Among the changes being proposed is stopping same-day enrolment for voters in a general election. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said allowing late … View moreThe Government is making a “significant, but necessary change” to New Zealand’s electoral laws to address “strain on the system”.
Among the changes being proposed is stopping same-day enrolment for voters in a general election. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said allowing late enrolments was “well intentioned” but had placed pressure on the system.
Also being dealt to is offering treats to voters. A new offence will be created prohibiting the provision of free food, drink and entertainment within 100 metres of a voting place while voting is occurring. Offenders could be punished with a fine of up to $10,000.
“There has been some confusion in the past around what is and isn’t ‘treating’. This will make the rules crystal clear,” Goldsmith said.
The list of key changes includes:
===========================
Closing enrolment 13 days before election day to reduce pressure on post-election timeframes.
Requiring 12 days of advance voting at each election.
Introducing automatic enrolment updates so the Electoral Commission can update people’s enrolment details using data from other government agencies.
Enabling greater use of digital communication by removing postal requirements for enrolment.
Creating a new offence that prohibits the provision of free food, drink or entertainment within 100m of a voting place while voting is taking place. It will be punishable by a fine of up to $10,000.
Reinstating a total ban on prisoner voting.
“The donation threshold for reporting the names of party donors is also being adjusted from $5000 to $6000, to account for inflation.”
============================================
Goldsmith said late enrolments had “placed too much strain on the system”.
“The final vote count used to take two weeks, last election it took three,” he said.
“If we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections. The 20-day timeframe for a final result will likely already be challenging to achieve at the next election without changes.
“Therefore, the Government has agreed to close enrolment before advance voting begins. People will need to make sure they enrol or update their enrolment details by midnight on the Sunday, before advance voting opens on Monday morning.
“This is a significant, but necessary change. The Electoral Commission will have plenty of time to run an education campaign to ensure people understand the new requirements.
“For Australia’s federal election earlier this year, the enrolment deadline was 26 days before election day. I have every confidence New Zealand can manage within the 13-day deadline.”
Act justice spokesman Todd Stephenson welcomed the reforms, saying it was “outrageous” that someone “completely disengaged and lazy can rock up to the voting booth, get registered there and then, and then vote to tax other people’s money away”.
“People who want to pull the levers of democracy ought to get organised, look at the policies, and register well in advance,” he said.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins called it “draconian”.
“Preventing people from enrolling to vote during advance voting is a draconian measure that could rob tens of thousands of Kiwis of their democratic right to vote, and there is no good reason for it. It’s anti-democratic.”
The Greens’ spokeswoman for democracy and electoral reform, Celia Wade Brown, said the Government was “weakening our democracy”.
“What we do with our democracy matters; who we shut out and who we afford special privileges shapes the decisions made in Parliament and the direction this country is taken in.”
The Herald reported last year that the Government was looking to overturn the 2020 decision to allow same-day enrolment after a report from the Auditor-General exposed a series of problems with counting votes at the most recent election.
The report noted that none of the problems found with the most recent election would have changed the national result or the result in any individual electorate.
The report did not recommend changing the Electoral Act to prohibit election-day enrolments, but it found that the 2020 change had put immense pressure on the Electoral Commission because same-day enrolments must be counted as special votes, meaning they take 10 times longer to process than ordinary votes.
Hipkins said at the time that the changes should be kept, given that 100,000 people took up the opportunity to enrol on election day.
“I think in a fiscally constrained time, and particularly where there are so many issues that are being hotly contested, it’s important that we ensure that everybody has the right to vote and that everybody’s vote gets counted. The Government’s simply saying, ‘Hey, we’re going to cancel 100,000 people’s votes.’ That’s not democratic,” Hipkins said.
Other changes being made, according to Goldsmith, include allowing special vote processing earlier, increasing the number of members on the Electoral Commission board, and setting a single deadline for candidate nominations.
“The Government is progressing a separate bill to amend the Constitution Act 1986 to ensure the continuity of executive government in the post-election period,” a statement said.
This will address an issue where ministers may remain in office after an election for 28 days while the final count is completed. However, if there is a delay to the election results (for example, due to a recount), then the 28 days can expire before new MPs are appointed. This happened at the 2023 election.
The bill will allow for ministers to remain in office until all successful electorate and list MPs have been declared.
==================================================
© Neighbourly 2025
Loading…
