W
905 days ago

Why COP26 Will Probably Fail: The Unmentionable Human Overpopulation

Wayne from Levin

There seems to be little or no mention of human overpopulation at COP26. Probably because it's to hard politically for discussion to be allowed. If Earth is to be saved, Governments and politicians, including ours, and we as individuals will have to commit to change many of their and our most cherished established beliefs and behaviours. At present Governments and individuals worldwide are wasting their time and resources dealing with the symptoms; not the actual disease. We need to accept the inconvenient truth, that there are far too many of us for our planet to sustain. Our unrestricted population growth is the real problem. There is a general consensus among experts, that the maximum human population that Earth can sustain, without any further degradation of our environment, and further extinction of other species is somewhere between 500 Million and 2 Billion. We are already closing in on 8 Billion with future estimated growth this century to 12 Billion, and up to a million other species at risk of extinction.

Some beliefs and behaviours that do need to become extinct:

1. The belief that universal, free birth control is not essential. Feeding the millions dying of famine is at best only a band aid fix.

2. The belief that an individual or country's consumption, of far more than their fair share of Earth's limited or finite resources, should depend only upon their ability to pay: not upon any consideration of the morality of their choices, or the damage to our environment. We need more cooperation and sharing, not more competition for resources. We cannot keep on allowing conspicuous, unnecessary consumption by the wealthy countries and individuals, like private jets, private yachts, and fossil-fueled international travel and tourism limited only by the ability to pay. The race to space tourism, unnecessary fossil-fueled driving, motor sport, and boy racers are all crimes against our environment. Regulation and rationing of individual entitlements will, in time, be seen as essential to save our planet.

3.The belief that societies cannot survive without continued growth, and that any and all growth, including population growth is good. Earth desperately needs population reduction. Having more than 1 child is a crime against our environment and planet.

4. We will have to ban nearly all plastics and artificial textiles. Plastics, and their offspring microplastics particles are invading and damaging our environment, our food chains, and our bodies. Fashion is another crime against our planet.

I fear that human nature and greed will not allow us to change our beliefs, and sense of entitlement to more than our fair share, and we will not be able to reduce our global overpopulation and overconsumption of resources in time to save our environment and planet. If that is so, in time, nature will do it for us the way it always has, by wars over resources, famines, and pandemics. I am glad that I will not have to see the world that my children and grandchildren will live in.

Madagascar is a horror story, and also an extreme example of what happens when human overpopulation is not addressed.

Why ‘Food Aid’ Won’t Solve Famine in Madagascar

populationnews.wordpress.com...

More messages from your neighbours
17 minutes ago

Say goodbye to tyre waste

Tyrewise

About 40% of the 6.5 million tyres Kiwis use every year are recycled, repurposed, or used as tyre-derived fuel. But the rest end up in landfills, stockpiled or dumped.

The good news is now there’s an easy solution to all that tyre waste. It’s called Tyrewise and is New Zealand’s first national tyre recycling scheme.

Tyrewise ensures that tyres in Aotearoa New Zealand are recycled or repurposed properly, saving millions from going to the landfill.

Find out more about the scheme online.
Find out more

Image
5 hours ago

Shag @ Foxton (1210)

Paul from Levin

A shag over the Manawatu River at Foxton Beach

Image
2 days ago

Poll: Does the building consent process need to change?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

We definitely need homes that are fit to live in but there are often frustrations when it comes to getting consent to modify your own home.
Do you think changes need made to the current process for building consent? Share your thoughts below.

Type 'Not For Print' if you wish your comments to be excluded from the Conversations column of your local paper.

Image
Does the building consent process need to change?
  • 91.7% Yes
    91.7% Complete
  • 7.8% No
    7.8% Complete
  • 0.5% Other - I'll share below!
    0.5% Complete
835 votes